INDECISION
By Richard Banks
Elections
are not for the indecisive. For the afflicted - me included - they are a
multi-choice torture equivalent to being stretched on the rack or roasted over
a red hot fire. It’s bad enough when the choice is between one or the other but
there are at least six of them, parties I mean, saying different things and
appearing not to get on. If only it was a matter of deciding which party has
the best policies – whatever they are – but it seems that should you get it
wrong you’re not just guilty of voting into office a party less suited to
govern but one that will wreck the economy and bring civilisation crashing to
an end!
It’s all too difficult; I shouldn’t be
asked to decide. Nevertheless I will do my democratic duty and endeavour to
make an informed decision. So, that’s why I’m sat in front of the TV for the
first of the candidates’ debates.
My first sensation is of relief. It
seems that all I have to do is choose between a weaselly looking man who
intermittently morphs into a Rottweiler or one who could be a body double for
Fozzie Bear. There is a studio audience who ask questions and a lady who tells
off the candidates when they keep on
talking after she has told them not to. But at the start it’s all sweetness and
light, the candidates smile ingratiatingly at the audience and when one of them
asks a question they call the questioner by his or her first name like he knows
them and wants to be their new best friend. The audience stare back like
parents meeting an unsuitable young man who wants to marry their daughter.
The candidates are of the opinion that
although they are no longer young they are, at least, suitable and attempt to
convince the audience of this by telling little stories about themselves. They
both have parents who were [and hopefully still are] paragons of virtue who
brought up their sons to be the fine upstanding chaps they are today. The bear
discloses the information that his father was a toolmaker which in less
salubrious company might not be considered a recommendation. Perhaps fearing
this to be a tactical error he endeavours to give the impression that his
father was so unsuccessful in this endeavour that he was unable to pay the
family’s telephone bill. The weasel sensing the odium of unpaid bills tells the
audience that the bear man and his party want to increase everyone’s tax by
thousands and thousands of pounds and make them so poor they won’t be able to
pay any of their bills. The bear man at first looks thoughtful as though he
hadn’t quite realised that this would be the effect of his policies but later
gets really narky with the weasel who he says is making it all up.
At this point they not only talk too
much but also at the same time which really gets the goat of the lady, who
nonetheless manages not to turn into one. When it calms down the weasel decides
to tell everyone that he has a plan. He says this in a jubilant way reminiscent
of Prince Monolulu, a racing tipster, who use to appear at the
So, it’s one out of two I’m thinking,
that shouldn’t be too difficult but then it is; the programme’s not over, there
are four more candidates waiting to make their pitch – three dogs and a bird.
This time the format’s different, they are interviewed separately which doesn’t
stop them talking too long as well as answering their own questions instead of
the ones they’re been asked.
First up is a sparky Jack Russell who
would much rather be having fun falling-off surf boards or riding fairground
attractions than sitting in a TV studio talking serious stuff about politics.
Nevertheless he smiles throughout his interrogation and just to prove he’s not
barking mad explains that the cost of his policies -
having less elastic budgets than those of the last two parties – will
definitely put-up taxes. However, if he should be at the helm when the ship of
state goes down we will all have lots
of fun frolicking in the sea.
Next on is a Dobermann Pinscher whose
leader is this blokey self-made man who, when not at home, is often to be found
in his ‘local’, or someone else’s local, sampling the real ales on offer. The
Dobermann is a self satisfied sort of a dog who is convinced that the world
would be a much better place if everyone was just like him. Global warming
doesn’t exist and all that is necessary to ensure prosperity for the nation is
to allow dogs like himself, and chaps like his master, to make as much money as
they can with a minimum of regulation. He growls in unfriendly fashion at the
next dog who is a Border Collie representing a party you can only vote for in
The bird, whose turn it now is, does
believe in global warming. He wants to save the Earth and everything in it,
even if this does include the Dobermann. He is a dainty bird, with a
distinctive livery who speaks in a gentle purr. Despite the cats and humans who
have made his kind an endangered species he will continue to persuade all those
with ears to listen that only his party can turn down the thermostat and
heal the world. True to the instincts of his party it is co-led by himself and
a lady turtle-dove.
The programme ends and I am left to
ponder on everything that has been said, which has been much, and as all the
animals are equally insistent that they are the best I am as undecided as
before. However, there is a body of people much wiser than myself who will, I’m
sure, be able to advise me so I will put off my decision until seeing them
again at the next meeting of Rayleigh Writers.
Copyright Richard Banks
By which time you will already have cast your vote, (or not)... Nice one!
ReplyDeleteYou have have managed to make politics entertaining. Future political debates will be much more fun. Well done!
ReplyDelete